Recently, some colleagues and I were discussing whether the Content Server truncated result sets for large queries. They insisted that it did and that the largest result set Documentum would return was 1000 rows or 350 rows from any single source (the default values for and in the file). “Ridiculous!”, I exclaimed. I had run queries that returned 1,000s of rows and could prove it. So, I set out on this little research project.

To prove my point, I decided to run a query that returned a known result set from a variety of clients, while changing the settings of and To set these properties, I added the following lines to the file on both the Content Server and the DA web application server. I set these properties artificially low to make the results obvious. = 100 = 10

The query I ran was select r_object_id from dm_folder. In my repository, this query returned 743 rows (from iDQL, which I used as my baseline). I also ran this query from the RepoInt utility, the DA DQL Editor and the DA Advanced Search page. If there was any truth to the claims of my colleagues, I should see a result set no larger than 100 rows when the properties were in effect. See the table below for the results.

Client No Config Changes Content Server Only App Server Only
iDQL32 743 743 743
RepoInt 743 743 743
DA DQL Editor 743 743 743
DA Adv. Search 350 350 10

Interestingly, the Advanced Search did truncate the result set, but not as I expected. It truncated the result set to 350 when these properties were not explicitly set, leading me to believe there was some sort of default in play. It also truncated the result set to 10, not 100, when the properties were set. What’s going on here?

After reading up a bit on and properties, I concluded that these configuration settings only affect ECIS/FS2 searches and not “regular” client searches (i.e., iDQL, RepoInt, DQL Editor, etc.). However, since Webtop (and DA) are configured to use ECIS/FS2 when they are installed, it appears that the Advanced Search does respect the and properties when they are set. Here’s how it works:

The property dictates how large the final result set can be. The default value is 1,000. In my testing, this was supposed to be 100 rows. However, this setting is the maximum setting for the entire result set and is further constrained by the property.

The property dictates the maximum number of results that can be returned from a single source. The default value is 350. Since my testing only involved one repository, the maximum number of results returned was 10. If I had searched across 2 repositories, the final result set would have contained 20 rows (max). Following this logic, if I had searched across 20 repositories, the result would have been 100 (the maximum size allows by the property), not 200 as expected.

My advice is if you are only searching on one repository, set the and properties equal to each other to ensure your Advanced Searches return maximum result sets. What the actual value of these properties are to produce maximum performance and efficiency is up to you to determine.

So, my colleagues and I were both right, we just needed to specify how we were running our queries.

This blog was originally posted at on Juy 5, 2010.


Need a bit more info on how Armedia can help you?

Feel free to schedule a 30-minute no-obligations meeting.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *